United States v. Sanchez-Lopez
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
858 F.3d 1064 (2017)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Jesus Sanchez-Lopez (defendant), a Mexican citizen, pleaded guilty to the federal government's (plaintiff) charge that his presence in the United States violated 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The federal probation officer reported that Sanchez-Lopez had a long record of reentering the country illegally and committing violent crimes on American soil. Following Sanchez-Lopez's last § 1326(a) conviction, he had served 18 months in prison. The maximum penalty recommended by the United States Sentencing Guidelines for Sanchez-Lopez's crime was 21 months' imprisonment, but the judge sentenced Sanchez-Lopez to 24 months in prison. In imposing the sentence, the judge explained that he gave full and careful consideration to factors that weighed in Sanchez-Lopez's favor. The judge further explained that, nevertheless, he decided to impose a penalty above the recommended sentencing range because previous in-range penalties had failed to deter Sanchez-Lopez from repeating his pattern of illegal reentry. The judge expressed the hope that, this time, a sentence slightly in excess of what the guidelines recommended would provide an adequate deterrent and achieve other beneficial goals such as protecting the community from Sanchez-Lopez's propensity for violence. Sanchez-Lopez appealed his sentence to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.