United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 28 (1913)
Felipe Sandoval (defendant) was charged under federal law with introducing alcohol onto the lands of the Pueblo Indians in the State of New Mexico. The district court dismissed the indictment against Sandoval. The district court held that the federal government lacked jurisdiction to enforce federal law on Pueblo Indian land and that the exercise of federal jurisdiction would conflict with the police powers of the State of New Mexico. The federal government appealed, pointing out that, upon admission to the United States, New Mexico had agreed that Pueblo Indian land would be treated as Indian land subject to federal law. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Van Devanter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.