From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
United States v. Santos
United States Supreme Court
553 U.S. 507 (2008)
Santos (defendant) ran an illegal lottery in Indiana for approximately 20 years. Santos employed runners to gather the bets in bars and restaurants from gamblers. The runners gave the money from the bets, after keeping a portion as their commission, to Santos’s collectors, who then turned the money over to Santos. Santos used the money to pay his collectors, pay the eventual lottery winners, and presumedly to make a profit himself. Santos and some coconspirators were charged with a number of crimes, including money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1), based on the transactions between the runners, the collectors, and Santos. Santos was convicted and filed motions attacking the convictions with the district court. The district court dismissed all of the motions except the challenge to the money-laundering charge. The district court found that a Seventh Circuit case, United States v. Scialabba, 282 F.3d 475 (2002), had ruled that the prohibition in § 1956(a)(1) against money laundering criminal proceeds applied only to criminal profits, not receipts. The district court then held that the transactions in question in Santos’s case amounted only to receipts and therefore vacated that conviction. The court of appeals affirmed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Alito, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.