United States v. Schmidt

626 F. 2d 616 (1980)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Schmidt

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
626 F. 2d 616 (1980)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Clarence Frederick Schmidt (defendant) for involuntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1112. The jury could infer from the somewhat contradictory trial evidence that Schmidt was intoxicated and speeding when he ignored a stop sign and drove into the path of Mark Van Heeder's car, crashing into the car and killing Van Heeder. There was also evidence that Schmidt knew his car's brakes were defective, and that just before the accident a passenger alerted Schmidt to Van Heeder's car and advised Schmidt to apply his emergency brake. The trial judge properly instructed the jury as to the law, and the jury returned a guilty verdict. Schmidt appealed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, contending that the evidence established at most that he acted with simple negligence, rather than with the gross negligence needed to sustain a conviction for involuntary manslaughter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hanson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership