United States v. Schneider

34 M.J. 639 (1992)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Schneider

United States Army Court of Military Review
34 M.J. 639 (1992)

Facts

Major David P. Schneider (defendant) was accused of attempting to murder his wife, Debbie Schneider, by throwing her from an eighth-floor hotel balcony. Schneider was tried in state court for attempted murder and acquitted. Schneider’s state-trial testimony included false statements concerning the events surrounding his wife’s fall from the balcony. A general court-martial subsequently tried Schneider for attempted murder and perjury. Schneider moved to dismiss the perjury charge, arguing that the Fifth Amendment Double Jeopardy Clause precluded the United States government (plaintiff) from trying him for perjury. Schneider reasoned that because his state-court testimony was directly related to the attempted-murder charge and the jury found in his favor on that charge, he could not be charged with perjury for his testimony. The military judge denied Schneider’s motion to dismiss, and he was convicted of attempted murder and perjury. Schneider appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (De Giulio, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership