Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

United States v. Schultz

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
178 F.Supp.2d 445 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)


Facts

Schultz (defendant) allegedly conspired to steal ancient Egyptian artifacts and bring them into the United States. He was charged with conspiracy to receive or possess stolen foreign goods under 18 U.S.C. § 2315, which provides that “[w]hoever receives, possesses, conceals, stores, barters, sells, or disposes of any goods, wares, or merchandise . . . which have crossed a State or United States boundary after being stolen . . . knowing the same to have been stolen . . . [is guilty of a crime].” Schultz filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the indictment presupposed that an individual conspiring to take artifacts from Egypt to the United States was guilty of dealing in stolen goods under Egyptian Law 117 (Law 117). Law 117 provided that all Egyptian historical artifacts were considered to be property of the state. Schultz argued that Law 117 was a mere regulation, and, essentially, that he could not be guilty of conspiracy to possess stolen goods because violation of Law 117 did not necessarily mean that he was guilty of the crime of dealing in stolen goods.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rakoff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.