United States v. Schultz

178 F.Supp.2d 445 (2002)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Schultz

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
178 F.Supp.2d 445 (2002)

SC

Facts

Schultz (defendant) allegedly conspired to steal ancient Egyptian artifacts and bring them into the United States. He was charged with conspiracy to receive or possess stolen foreign goods under 18 U.S.C. § 2315, which provides that “[w]hoever receives, possesses, conceals, stores, barters, sells, or disposes of any goods, wares, or merchandise . . . which have crossed a State or United States boundary after being stolen . . . knowing the same to have been stolen . . . [is guilty of a crime].” Schultz filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the indictment presupposed that an individual conspiring to take artifacts from Egypt to the United States was guilty of dealing in stolen goods under Egyptian Law 117 (Law 117). Law 117 provided that all Egyptian historical artifacts were considered to be property of the state. Schultz argued that Law 117 was a mere regulation, and, essentially, that he could not be guilty of conspiracy to possess stolen goods because violation of Law 117 did not necessarily mean that he was guilty of the crime of dealing in stolen goods.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rakoff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership