Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Schwimmer

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989)


Facts

Martin Schwimmer (defendant) was charged with a number of crimes related to investment fraud. His partner, Mario Renda, was also charged. Schwimmer and Renda each hired a law firm to help with their defense. They and their attorneys agreed to cooperate “in all matters of mutual concern related to the investigation.” That cooperation included Renda’s attorney hiring Ralph Glickman, an accountant, to assist in the defense of both Renda and Schwimmer. Schwimmer had a number of confidential conversations with Glickman as his attorney told him that any such conversations were protected by the attorney-client privilege. After Renda’s trial ended, the Assistant U.S. Attorney ordered Glickman to turn over the documents he produced in the formulation of Renda’s defense. At Schwimmer’s trial, the prosecution did not admit into evidence the documents that Glickman had turned over, but Schwimmer claimed that the prosecution used information derived from those documents in building their case against Schwimmer. The prosecution disputed this claim. Schwimmer was convicted. He appealed on the grounds that the prosecution violated the attorney-client privilege by using information derived from Glickman’s reports to build their case.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Miner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.