From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
United States v. Scott
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23720 (2010)
Varian Scott (defendant) was charged with forging prescriptions for medications. The police seized prescription pads that contained fraudulent prescriptions. There were unknown fingerprints on the prescription pads. At the trial, the government (plaintiff) sought to introduce expert testimony from Jessica LeCroy, a fingerprint examiner. In order to identify the fingerprints on the prescription pads, LeCroy used the ACE-V procedure. The ACE-V procedure allowed an examiner to compare a fingerprint from an unknown person (a latent print) with a fingerprint from a known person (an inked print). Specifically, the examiner determined whether the latent print and the inked print shared characteristics. Based on the number of shared characteristics, the examiner expressed an opinion as to whether there was a match between the latent print and the inked print. Hence, the ACE-V procedure followed a formal, established methodology. Additionally, the ACE-V procedure was generally accepted within the community of fingerprint experts. LeCroy testified that, in her opinion, the fingerprints on the prescription pads matched Scott’s fingerprints. The district-court judge admitted LeCroy’s opinion. Subsequently, Scott was convicted. Scott appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.