United States v. Scrushy

2004 WL 2713262 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Scrushy

United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
2004 WL 2713262 (2004)

KS

Facts

Richard Scrushy (defendant) was the chief executive officer of HealthSouth Corporation. As the chief executive officer, Scrushy certified in writing the accuracy of HealthSouth’s financial reports as required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The United States (plaintiff) indicted Scrushy for multiple criminal violations related to the alleged wrongful inflation of HealthSouth stock and the subsequent financial enrichment of Scrushy and others. The indictment included three counts of false certification under § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Scrushy filed a motion to dismiss the three counts arising under § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, arguing that § 906 is so vague as to be unconstitutional on its face. Specifically, Scrushy argued that the terms “fairly presents, in all material respects” and “willfully certifies” are facially unconstitutional and that these terms are so vague that an ordinary individual cannot be aware of prohibited conduct.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bowdre, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership