United States v. Sharon Steel Corporation

30 ERC (BNA) 1778 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Sharon Steel Corporation

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
30 ERC (BNA) 1778 (1989)

Facts

Sharon Steel Corporation (Sharon) (defendant) operated a steel-production plant that discharged wastewater into a tributary of the Mahoning River in Ohio. A provision of the Clean Water Act (CWA) established the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), under which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could issue permits that allowed for the discharge of pollutants and that required the permit holders to monitor and sample their discharge. After discharging wastewater for some years, Sharon filed a permit application under the CWA. While waiting for the permit to be approved, Sharon continued to discharge polluted wastewater. The discharge of the polluted wastewater went on for more than five years, including the time before and after the permit application was filed. Sharon’s permit was eventually granted. The EPA subsequently issued a finding and order against Sharon on the grounds that it had discharged illegal pollutants prior to the permit being issued. The United States (plaintiff), on behalf of the EPA, then brought this enforcement action against Sharon claiming it had illegally discharged pollutants under the CWA. Sharon argued that it had complied with the CWA by applying for the permit and was therefore shielded from liability. It further argued that enforcement of any illegal-discharge actions that took place more than five years ago was blocked by the statute of limitations. The United States moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mason, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership