United States v. Shaw
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
670 F.3d 360 (2012)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Hazen Shaw (defendant) for possessing an unregistered sawed-off shotgun shorter than 18 inches in length, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 and 5871. Each statute contained a scienter element but no express mens rea element. The trial evidence showed that state troopers responded to a report that a man was firing shots in a residential area. The man sped away in his car and later tried to elude a roadblock by ramming a trooper's vehicle. Troopers finally trapped the man, and as they approached his car, they heard him unload a pump-action shotgun. The troopers identified the man as Shaw and arrested him for eluding arrest and reckless conduct. The troopers searched the passenger compartment of Shaw's car and found a shotgun that was visibly sawed-off, a spent shell, and ammunition in Shaw's pack and on his hunting belt. The shotgun's interior barrel length was 16.25 inches, and the barrel's exterior appearance was even shorter. A state police expert could tell at first glance that the barrel was too short. Troopers found a longer sawed-off shotgun with a different gauge in the car's trunk. Additional evidence indicated that Shaw had been sitting in his car and shooting at game through the car's open window. Shaw contended that the government failed to prove that he knew the barrel was too short, and moved to dismiss the case. The trial judge denied Shaw's motion and the jury convicted him. Shaw appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Howard, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.