Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Shivers

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
96 F.3d 120 (1996)


Facts

The Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 470aa-ll, prohibited the unpermitted removal of archaeological resources from federal land. The federal common law of finds (common law) assigned ownership of abandoned property to the finder, regardless of where the property was found. Under an exception to the common law, property found embedded in soil belonged to the owner of the soil. Billy Ray Shivers (defendant) found metal tokens buried in the soil of an abandoned lumber mill located within the Angelina National Forest. The tokens, used as payment for mill workers, were between 50 and 100 years old. The United States government (government) (plaintiff) seized and claimed ownership of the tokens. The district court found that neither ARPA nor the common law gave Shivers ownership of the tokens, and that the government owned the tokens. The district court also denied Shivers’s motion for the return of the tokens. Shivers appealed, arguing that ARPA and the common law gave him ownership of the tokens because (1) section 470kk(b) of ARPA provided that a permit was not required for coin collection undertaken for private purposes if the coins were non-archaeological resources, and § 470bb(1) of ARPA excluded items less than 100 years of age from ARPA’s definition of “archaeological resource”; and (2) the arrowhead exception of 16 U.S.C. § 470ff(a)(3) supported Shivers’s claim of ownership, because the exception eliminated civil and criminal penalties under ARPA for the removal of arrowheads from the surface of federal land.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.