Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

United States v. Siegelman

640 F.3d 1159 (2011)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

United States v. Siegelman

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

640 F.3d 1159 (2011)

Facts

In 1998, Don Siegelman (defendant) was elected governor of Alabama. Following his election, a lobbyist for HealthSouth Corporation, a major hospital system that operated throughout Alabama, met with Siegelman on behalf of the chief executive officer (CEO) Richard Scrushy. Scrushy had served on the Alabama Certificate of Need Review Board (CON Board) during the three previous governorships and hoped to remain on the board. The CON Board was responsible for approving healthcare applications, which was necessary before a health facility could be established in Alabama. As a member of the CON Board, Scrushy had authority to vote to reject applications that could create competition with HealthSouth. Siegelman informed the lobbyist that because Scrushy had contributed to his opponent’s campaign, Scrushy would need to donate $500,000 to Siegelman’s Alabama Education Lottery Foundation campaign. Scrushy instructed one of the company’s investment bankers to make the contribution. The banker was concerned with the optics of providing such a large contribution and instructed Integrated Health Services of Maryland (IHS) to make the donation in exchange for HealthSouth reducing the amount of money IHS owed the corporation. IHS agreed to the deal and donated $250,000. One week later, Siegelman appointed Scrushy to the CON Board. Siegelman then issued a check by HealthSouth for $250,000 to the Alabama Education Lottery Foundation. Siegelman and Scrushy were indicted and charged with federal-fund bribery, honest-services conspiracy, and honest-services mail fraud.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership