United States v. Sioux Nation

448 U.S. 371 (1980)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Sioux Nation

United States Supreme Court
448 U.S. 371 (1980)

Play video

Facts

In 1868, the Sioux Nation (plaintiff) signed the Fort Laramie Treaty with the US government (defendant). The treaty established the Great Sioux Reservation and promised that no unauthorized persons would be permitted to enter or settle there. In exchange, the Sioux gave up their right to occupy lands outside the reservation. In the 1870s, gold was discovered in the Black Hills on the reservation, attracting miners and settlers. Originally, the US army prevented them from trespassing on the reservation. However, the government later decided it was better to recover the Black Hills from the Sioux. Initial negotiations broke down. At the same time, Congress was increasingly frustrated by the Sioux’s ongoing reliance on subsistence food rations that the government was no longer obligated to provide. Eventually, the United States convinced the Sioux leaders to sign an 1876 treaty giving up the Black Hills in exchange for continued subsistence rations for as long as they were necessary for the Sioux’s survival. Although the Sioux leaders signed the treaty, it was not signed by three-fourths of adult males as required by the Fort Laramie Treaty. Many of the Sioux considered the 1876 treaty and the 1877 act enacting it to be illegitimate. The Sioux Nation spent many years attempting to sue the United States for just compensation for the land. Eventually, the Indian Claims Commission held that the 1877 act was a taking of Sioux land without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. In 1979, the court of claims affirmed, holding that the Sioux were entitled to $17.1 million plus interest dating from 1877. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)

Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership