Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U

United States v. Smithfield Foods

191 F.3d 516 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Smithfield Foods

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
191 F.3d 516 (1999)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Smithfield Foods (plaintiff) operated two swine processing plants in Virginia that dumped wastewater into the Pagan River. Smithfield had a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, but its effluent-pollution concentrations exceeded the permit’s limits. Smithfield decided to connect to the Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) system to control its effluent pollution. However, connection to the HRSD system took six years, and Smithfield made no effort to expedite the connection or to comply with NPDES effluent-pollution limits in the intervening years. The federal government sued under the Clean Water Act (CWA), seeking injunctive relief and penalties for effluent-limit violations and reporting failures. The district court found Smithfield liable for 6,982 days of violations and issued a detailed, factor-based decision supporting a $12.6 million penalty. Smithfield appealed, arguing the district court improperly calculated the penalty because it (1) trebled the amount of the calculated economic benefit rather than weighing the CWA factors; (2) improperly calculated the economic benefit and failed to credit Smithfield for costs expended preparing for the HRSD connection; and (3) failed to give Smithfield a good-faith credit for its decision to connect to HRSD.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ervin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Environmental Law

Key Terms