United States v. Stapf
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 118 (1963)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Lowell Stapf died while domiciled in Texas, a community-property state. In community-property states, the death of a married person meant that half of the property held in community passed automatically to the surviving spouse. That half was not treated as a transfer from the decedent’s estate and, thus, was not subject to estate tax. Stapf died with a will, and his wife had the option to either inherit property according to the mechanisms in the will or, alternatively, to take her one-half share of the community property. Mrs. Stapf chose to take under the will. The will granted Mrs. Stapf one-third of the total community property, plus one-third of Stapf’s separate estate. Additionally, the will required that, by making this choice, Mrs. Stapf’s one-half share in the community property go to a trust for the benefit of the couple’s children. As it turned out, Mrs. Stapf’s election caused Mrs. Stapf ultimately to receive slightly less money than she would have had she chosen not to follow the will. Because Mrs. Stapf gained no benefit by electing to inherit under the will, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) denied Stapf’s estate (plaintiff) any marital deduction. The estate challenged that determination. The district court allowed the marital deduction, as did the court of appeals. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goldberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.