United States v. Starks
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
157 F.3d 833 (1998)
Andrew Siegel (defendant) was the president of Future Steps, a corporation that developed and operated drug addiction treatment programs. Future Steps contracted with a Florida hospital that participated in the Medicaid program, to operate a chemical dependency unit for pregnant women. Siegel initialed each page of the contract, including a provision explicitly forbidding Future Steps from making any payment for patient referrals in violation of the federal anti-kickback statute. Angela Starks (defendant) and Barbara Henry (defendant), Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services employees, were assigned to a federally-funded research project advising pregnant women about drug abuse treatment options. Starks and Henry were informed that they were prohibited from accepting outside employment that might be a conflict of interest with their work on the project. Siegel offered to pay Starks and Henry $250 each for every patient they referred. For nearly one year, Starks and Henry discretely accepted money for referring 18 women to Future Steps from Siegel. At trial, several of the referred women testified that Starks and Henry made threats that the state would take away their babies if they did not receive treatment from Future Steps. A jury found Starks, Henry, and Siegel guilty for violating the anti-kickback statute and each appealed. On appeal, it was argued that the district court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the proper mens rea standard of the statute and that the statute was unconstitutionally vague.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Birch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 709,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.