United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
779 F.2d 232 (1985)
The United States government (plaintiff) charged Columbus Schalah Stephens, Jr. (defendant) with making false statements on his application for a federal loan. At trial, the judge admitted government charts as evidence. The charts summarized hundreds of complex trial exhibits and grouped them into categories. The judge instructed the jury to consider the charts solely as summaries and not as real evidence of the alleged crime. The jury convicted Stephens. On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Stephens argued the charts were inadmissible because: (1) they were pedagogical devices and not summaries under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006, (2) the categories contained in the charts were impermissibly argumentative, and (3) Rule 1006 allows the use of summaries only if exhibits are impossible to examine in the courtroom.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.