Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Sterling

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
724 F.3d 482 (4th Cir. 2013)


Facts

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) case officer Jeffrey Sterling (defendant) was assigned to a highly classified program that targeted Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear weapons. Two years later, Sterling and the CIA had a falling out that resulted in Sterling filing an unsuccessful employment-discrimination lawsuit against the CIA. Subsequently, Sterling was terminated from the CIA. After the CIA thwarted Sterling’s efforts to write a book about his experiences at the agency, Sterling filed another unsuccessful civil suit against the CIA, alleging unlawful infringement of his right to publish his memoirs. Sterling then had several telephone and email conversations with The New York Times reporter James Risen (defendant). Several years later, Risen published a book that included classified CIA information about the Iran nuclear-weapons program. Sterling was indicted on six counts of unauthorized retention and communication of national-defense information in violation of the Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. § 793(d)-(e). The government subpoenaed Risen to provide testimony about the identity of the sources used in the book. Risen moved to quash the subpoena, arguing that he was protected from compelled testimony by the First Amendment or, in the alternative, pursuant to a federal common-law reporter’s privilege. The district court granted the motion, and the government appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Traxler, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.