United States v. Stevens
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
935 F.2d 1380 (3d Cir. 1991)
On April 15, 1989, two Air Force police officers were robbed at gunpoint (and one of them sexually assaulted) at Fort Dix, New Jersey, near a bus shelter. The two victims, who were white, identified Richard Stevens (defendant), an African-American, as the perpetrator. At his trial, Stevens sought to admit evidence that in a similar robbery, the victim, Tyrone Mitchell, also African-American, stated that Stevens was not the robber. Stevens sought to introduce expert evidence that cross-racial identifications are unreliable, and that Mitchell’s statement that it was not Stevens was more reliable because they were of the same race. He also sought to introduce evidence that the police who investigated both crimes believed that one person committed both crimes, as they shared similar characteristics and things taken in both robberies all ended up in Fort Meade in Maryland. The district court excluded the evidence. Stevens was convicted of the robbery and sexual assault and appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Becker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.