United States v. Stokes

631 F. 3d 802 (2011)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Stokes

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
631 F. 3d 802 (2011)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Terence Stokes (defendant) for three bank robberies, two of which occurred at the same Trust One Bank branch office. The trial evidence established that on each of the three occasions, the robber wore a mask or sunglasses to conceal his identity. Police arrested Stokes after an accomplice identified him as the robber, and Stokes was tried two years later. Witnesses to each robbery testified that the robber was a dark-skinned male about six feet tall and weighing between 200 and 250 pounds. Sarah Britt, a teller present at both Trust One Bank robberies, testified that during the second robbery she could see the robber's face despite his concealing sunglasses. Prior to trial, from a police photographic lineup that omitted Stokes' photograph, Britt identified another man's photograph as resembling the robber. Now, at trial, Britt said she could tell from seeing Stokes in court that he was the man who committed the second robbery, even though Stokes was the only man in the courtroom who remotely matched the witnesses' descriptions of the robber. Britt also testified that, based on Stokes' speech in court, she could identify Stokes as the man whose voice she heard during both robberies, even though Britt last heard the robber's voice two years earlier. Britt testified that whoever committed the Trust One Bank robberies employed similar methods in each robbery. The jury found Stokes guilty of both Trust One Bank robberies. On appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, Stokes argued that the evidence was insufficient to identify him as the Trust One Bank robber.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership