United States v. Suerte
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
291 F.3d 366 (2002)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Nestor Suerte (defendant), captain of a ship registered in Malta, was involved with a Colombian and Venezuelan drug-trafficking organization (DTO). The United States (plaintiff) requested permission from Malta to investigate Suerte’s ship, and Malta waived objection to the United States enforcing its laws over Suerte. The United States Customs special agents then conducted a search, which revealed information referencing the date, time, and location of a cocaine pickup and $35,000. Suerte was arrested and indicted for violating the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA), under which it is unlawful to board a vessel subject to the United States’ jurisdiction with an intent to distribute a controlled substance. The MDLEA further provided that a vessel was subject to the United States’ jurisdiction if the vessel was registered in a foreign nation and the foreign nation waived objection to the United States enforcing its own laws. Suerte challenged the application of the MDLEA against him, arguing that the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution required a nexus between the foreign citizen and the United States. The district court agreed and dismissed the case on the ground that the United States lacked jurisdiction. The matter was appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barksdale, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.