United States v. Sultan

115 F.3d 321 (1997)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Sultan

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
115 F.3d 321 (1997)

KL

Facts

Mohammed Sultan (defendant) owned an auto-parts surplus warehouse and was an authorized dealer for automaker General Motors (GM). Sultan bought parts from GM and other suppliers and resold them overseas to customers in Saudi Arabia. For several years, Sultan operated his business out of a warehouse in which another auto-parts dealer, Garbis Jerjerian, also operated. Their businesses were separate, but Sultan occasionally purchased parts from Jerjerian. Sultan later moved his business to a new location. United States customs agents obtained a warrant for the warehouse Sultan and Jerjerian previously shared and out of which Jerjerian still operated. They discovered counterfeit auto parts and a storeroom containing counterfeit GM marks that Jerjerian applied to non-GM products. Sultan was still listed as an emergency contact for the warehouse despite doing business elsewhere and was contacted by officials in connection with the search. Both GM and U.S. customs agents also searched and reviewed Sultan’s new warehouse and business but did not find any counterfeit products or evidence of counterfeiting. Sultan and Jerjerian were both indicted for trafficking in counterfeit goods in violation of the Trademark Counterfeiting Act. A jury found Sultan guilty based on the government’s circumstantial case. The government argued that Sultan should have known about the counterfeiting given that he shared warehouse space with Jerjerian, and that Sultan was an experienced GM dealer who also should have known how GM products were priced and packaged, making him able to identify counterfeit goods.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership