From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
United States v. Taken Alive
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
262 F.3d 711 (2001)
A law-enforcement officer approached Ralph Emeron Taken Alive II (defendant) after being told that Taken Alive was intoxicated and had been fighting. According to the officer, he verbally instructed Taken Alive that he was being arrested for intoxication and directed him to get in the patrol car. Instead, Taken Alive grabbed the officer’s throat and pushed him up against the car. The officer punched Taken Alive, who ran off. The officer followed, the two struggled, and the officer handcuffed Taken Alive. Taken Alive’s testimony differed. According to Taken Alive, the officer initially twisted Taken Alive’s arm sharply behind his back and then slammed Taken Alive’s head into the patrol-car door as he was putting Taken Alive in the car. Taken Alive fell to the ground, where the officer hit him with an unidentified object. Taken Alive pulled the officer’s jacket over the officer’s head and fled. The officer ran after Taken Alive, knocked him down, hit him with a baton, and then handcuffed him. Taken Alive was charged with unlawfully resisting arrest but claimed he had acted in self-defense. The arresting officer had a reputation for being aggressive and violent, and Taken Alive had assaulted law-enforcement officers on four previous occasions. Under the applicable evidentiary rules, evidence of Taken Alive’s prior law-enforcement assaults was not admissible. However, under Rule of Evidence 404(a)(2)(B), evidence of the officer’s reputation for violence was admissible to support Taken Alive’s self-defense claim. Despite this, the district court excluded the reputation evidence under Rule of Evidence 403, finding that it would be unfair to exclude evidence of Taken Alive’s violent character but allow evidence of the officer’s violent character. The jury convicted Taken Alive, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bright, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.