Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Tarallo

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
380 F.3d 1174 (2004)


Facts

Aldo Tarallo (defendant) was a telemarketer in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme. Tarallo contacted potential investors by telephone and made several false representations to them. These representations were written on call scripts that management distributed to its telemarketers. Tarallo was charged with six counts of securities fraud. Tarallo argued that he was unaware that the statements he made to potential investors were false. At trial, another telemarketer who took part in the scheme testified that it was obvious that the script's promises of risk-free investment were false. In addition, there was evidence that Tarallo knowingly lied to investors about his office’s location to make the operation seem larger than it was. The district court instructed the jury to find that Tarallo was guilty of securities fraud if he made the false statements either knowing that they were false or with reckless indifference as to the truth or falsity of the statements. The instructions stated that Tarallo did not need to know that his actions were unlawful to be found to have acted knowingly. The district court also stated that "willfully" and "knowingly" had the same meaning. The jury convicted Tarallo. Tarallo appealed, arguing that the jury instructions were inappropriate.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Graber, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.