United States v. Teicher

987 F.2d 112 (1993)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Teicher

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
987 F.2d 112 (1993)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Victor Teicher and his arbitrage firm, Victor Teicher & Co. L.P. (Teicher) (defendants) traded in the securities of companies prior to anticipated acquisitions or mergers. Ross Frankel (defendant) was a research analyst in Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.’s arbitrage department. Teicher and Frankel received confidential nonpublic information from a lawyer at a large law firm, a trader at a brokerage firm, and an investment bank research analyst regarding possible corporate acquisitions and mergers. While in possession of this information, Teicher and Frankel traded in the stocks of companies that were the subject of takeover bids. Teicher and Frankel were convicted of securities fraud under the misappropriation theory of insider trading. On appeal, Teicher and Frankel argued that the district court erred in instructing the jury that it could convict Teicher and Frankel for trading while knowingly in the possession of material nonpublic information without evidence that the information was the actual cause of the trading.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Altimari, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership