United States v. The Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa Nostra
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
879 F.2d 20 (1989)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) filed a complaint alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in federal district court in New York against multiple defendants. One named defendant was the Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa Nostra (the Bonanno Family) (defendant). The Bonanno Family operated through groups called crews. Each crew was supervised by a crew chief. Crew chiefs reported to the boss, who was the head of the Bonanno Family, or to the underboss, who worked directly under the boss. Members of the Bonanno Family could only conduct illegal activities with permission from a superior. The government offered no evidence that any member of the Bonanno Family shared control of the enterprise with the boss or that any members were intended to be partners with the boss. The Bonanno Family objected to the complaint. The district court ruled in the Bonanno Family’s favor, finding that the Bonanno Family was not a “person” as defined under RICO and, therefore, could not be named as a defendant in the RICO action. The district court dismissed the case against the Bonanno Family. The government appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Conboy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.