United States v. Thomas
United States Court of Military Appeals
13 U.S.C.M.A. 278 (1962)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Thomas, McClellan (defendants), and another, enlistees in the military, met a young woman during a “bar hopping” spree and drove her around in McClellan’s vehicle from bar to bar drinking. Later that evening, the woman collapsed, and the three men decided to take her home. Shortly thereafter, each of the three men did, or attempted to, have sexual intercourse with the woman while they believed her to be unconscious in the back seat of the car. However, when the woman failed to regain consciousness, they became frightened and drove to a nearby gas station seeking help. A police officer was summoned and, upon his arrival, examined the woman only to learn that she was dead. Later, an autopsy confirmed that the woman had died earlier in the evening of “acute interstitial myocarditis,” a weakening of the heart muscles. The defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit rape, rape, and lewd and lascivious conduct. At their general court-martial, the third man testified against Thomas and McClellan in exchange for a more lenient sentence. The defendants argued that it was legally impossible to attempt to rape a woman who was deceased. The defendants were acquitted of rape but found guilty of attempted rape and the other charges. Each man was dishonorably discharged and sentenced to three years imprisonment. A military board of review set aside the convictions of attempted rape and conspiracy and modified the lewd-and-lascivious-conduct conviction. The matter was reviewed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kilday, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Ferguson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.