From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
United States v. Thoreen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
653 F.2d 1332 (1981)
Harold Thoreen (defendant) represented a commercial fisher, William Sibbett, in a nonjury criminal trial for violating a preliminary injunction against salmon-fishing. Thoreen hoped the government agent who had cited Sibbett for contempt would be unable to identify Sibbett. Thoreen had Clark Mason, who resembled Sibbett, dress in rugged clothing and sit next to Thoreen at counsel table. Sibbett dressed in a business suit and glasses and sat in the press row. The judge excluded witnesses from the courtroom, but Mason remained at counsel table. During the trial, Thoreen gestured to Mason as though he were Sibbett, had Mason take notes on a yellow pad, conferred with Mason, and did not correct the court when the court called Mason the defendant. Two government witnesses misidentified Mason as Sibbett. Thoreen called Mason as a witness and revealed his true identity. The government reopened its case, the government agent was recalled, and Sibbett was identified and convicted. The judge found Thoreen in criminal contempt because there was no identification issue in the case; Mason remained in the courtroom despite the order excluding witnesses; the court did not approve or have prior knowledge of the substitution; and the tactic disrupted the trial, deceived the court, thwarted the court’s responsibility to administer justice, and violated a court custom. Thoreen appealed, arguing that his conduct was a good-faith tactic in aid of cross-examination and constituted zealous advocacy.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.