United States v. Tipton

518 F.3d 591 (2008)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Tipton

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
518 F.3d 591 (2008)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Sadik Seferi and Nicole Tipton (defendants) for knowingly hiring and harboring six unlawful aliens, two of whom were minors, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A), and for conspiring to do so, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The trial evidence established that the aliens, in the United States illegally, worked in Tipton’s restaurant. Seferi and Tipton lived together, managed the restaurant as a joint enterprise, and split the restaurant's profits equally. Seferi hired the aliens and supervised their work in the restaurant's kitchen. The aliens' personnel files contained counterfeit identity documents. Unlike other employees, the aliens were hired without employment applications or interviews, worked for less than the minimum wage, and were paid in cash, with no tax or insurance withholdings. Tipton leased and paid for the aliens' apartments, and Seferi drove the aliens back and forth between the apartments and the restaurant. The federal district court judge found Seferi and Tipton guilty, and increased their sentences under federal sentencing guidelines USSG §§ 2L1.1(b)(2)(A) and 3B1.4, on the grounds that they hired and harbored six or more illegal aliens and used minors in the commission of their offenses. Seferi and Tipton appealed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on the grounds of insufficient evidence. Tipton also contended that no evidence proved she acted affirmatively to involve the minors in crime.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Colloton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 789,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership