United States v. Trujillo
United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
2010 WL 5476756 (2010)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Trujillo (defendant) for second-degree murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111. The government accepted Trujillo's plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1112. Trujillo requested a downward departure from the penalty stipulated by federal sentencing guidelines, because he had no criminal record and had been provoked by the victim, Brian Lester Sam. Taking Trujillo's account as true, Sam, who was drunk, picked a fight with Trujillo and poked him with what Trujillo wrongly assumed to be a knife. When Sam's remarks convinced Trujillo that Sam intended to take a gun from Trujillo's bedroom, Trujillo headed to the bedroom, retrieved the gun, and aimed it at Sam, who had followed him. Sam cursed, taunted, and moved menacingly toward Trujillo. Believing himself to be in danger, Trujillo stepped back and fired once, fatally wounding Sam. The government described Trujillo's account as establishing, at best, a case of imperfect self-defense. The government countered Trujillo's request for a reduced sentence by arguing that he had already been credited for Sam's provocation by being allowed to plead guilty to manslaughter instead of murder, and therefore a reduced sentence would credit Trujillo twice for the same behavior.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Browning, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.