United States v. Union Central Life Insurance Co.

368 U.S. 291, 82 S. Ct. 349, 7 L. Ed. 2d 294 (1961)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Union Central Life Insurance Co.

United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 291, 82 S. Ct. 349, 7 L. Ed. 2d 294 (1961)

LJ

Facts

In 1952 Robert Peters and his wife failed to pay federal income taxes. In 1954 an assessment for delinquency was filed in the Detroit office of the Internal Revenue Collector. The delinquency filing created a lien on all of the Peters’ property in favor of the United States (plaintiff). Ten months later, the Peters executed a mortgage on real property to secure an indebtedness to Union Central Life Insurance Company (Union Central) (defendant). The Peters defaulted on their mortgage, and Union Central filed to foreclose, naming the United States as a party defendant because of its tax lien. Union Central claimed that its mortgage had priority over the tax lien because the tax lien was not filed in Oakland County, where the property was located, as required by Michigan law. The United States disputed Union Central’s position, asserting that the tax lien had priority because it was properly filed with the district court in Detroit prior to Union Central’s foreclosure action. The United States further noted that it could not have filed the lien in Oakland County, because the recorder would not accept documents without a description of the subject property. The tax lien was filed on a federally mandated form, and that form did not include a section for a property description. The United States contended that the filing requirements of the Internal Revenue Code superseded any conflicting state law absent congressional authority. The Michigan state courts, including the Michigan Supreme Court, held that the United States’ lien did not comply with Michigan law and, therefore, was subordinate to the Union Central mortgage. The United States filed an appeal, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership