United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
United States Supreme Court
407 U.S. 297 (1972)
Criminal charges of conspiracy to destroy government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and bombing a Central Intelligence Agency office were brought against Plamondon and two other defendants (defendants) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The defendants filed a motion to compel the United States Government (Government) to produce information gathered through electronic surveillance and hold a hearing to ascertain whether the Government’s evidence was tainted by it. The Government provided an affidavit from the Attorney General that agents had eavesdropped Plamondon’s conversations and claimed the Attorney General was acting under the President’s national security authority. The district court concluded that the Fourth Amendment was violated and ordered the Government to produce all overheard conversations.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.