United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
United States Supreme Court
438 U.S. 422 (1978)
Gypsum board is a type of laminated wallboard used for interior walls and ceilings during building construction. The gypsum industry is highly concentrated, and gypsum itself is essentially identical regardless of the manufacturer. As a result, competition in the market for gypsum mainly exists in the form of differential pricing and delivery terms. The United States (plaintiff) brought a complaint against a group of gypsum manufacturers (defendants), alleging that the manufacturers were colluding to restrain competition in violation of the Sherman Act. Specifically, the government challenged the manufacturers’ practice of telephoning one another to confirm the prices of gypsum for specific customers. The district court issued a jury instruction, instructing the jurors to find that the manufacturers had intended to fix prices if the challenged practice actually affected prices. The jury found that the practice affected prices, and the manufacturers were convicted. The court of appeals overturned the conviction on the basis of an improper jury instruction. The government appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.