United States v. Vallery
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
437 F. 3d 626 (2006)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The federal government (plaintiff) obtained a grand jury's indictment of Roosevelt Vallery (defendant), a federal prison inmate, after Vallery pushed a prison guard in order to escape from a strip search for contraband. The indictment closely tracked the language of § 111(a)(1) in Title 18 U.S.C., Chapter 7 ("Assault"), which prohibits knowingly and forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, or interfering with a federal officer in the performance of his official duties. However, the indictment omitted any allegation that Vallery had physical contact with his victim, and therefore the judge ruled that Vallery was on trial only for misdemeanor simple assault. The jury found Vallery guilty of resisting, impeding, and interfering with the guard's performance of his duties, and the judge sentenced Vallery to the maximum misdemeanor penalty of 12 months' imprisonment. The government appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, contending that the judge should have imposed the felony penalty of between 51 and 63 months' imprisonment. The government argued that an allegation or proof of physical contact was relevant only to the "assault prong" of § 111(a)(1), and that because 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(2) made all assaults other than simple assault punishable as felonies, the indictment's failure to allege physical contact did not preclude sentencing Vallery as a felon for having resisted, impeded, and impaired the guard.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kanne, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.