Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Vallery

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
437 F.3d 626 (2006)


Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) obtained a grand jury's indictment of Roosevelt Vallery (defendant), a federal prison inmate, after Vallery pushed a prison guard in order to escape from a strip search for contraband. The indictment closely tracked the language of § 111(a)(1) in Title 18 U.S.C., Chapter 7 ("Assault"), which prohibits knowingly and forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, or interfering with a federal officer in the performance of his official duties. However, the indictment omitted any allegation that Vallery had physical contact with his victim, and therefore the judge ruled that Vallery was on trial only for misdemeanor simple assault. The jury found Vallery guilty of resisting, impeding, and interfering with the guard's performance of his duties, and the judge sentenced Vallery to the maximum misdemeanor penalty of 12 months' imprisonment. The government appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, contending that the judge should have imposed the felony penalty of between 51 and 63 months' imprisonment. The government argued that an allegation or proof of physical contact was relevant only to the "assault prong" of § 111(a)(1), and that because 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(2) made all assaults other than simple assault punishable as felonies, the indictment's failure to allege physical contact did not preclude sentencing Vallery as a felon for having resisted, impeded, and impaired the guard.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kanne, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial