United States v. Vankesteren

553 F.3d 286 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Vankesteren

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
553 F.3d 286 (2009)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

After a phone call alerted the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries that a protected bird was stuck in a cage in Steve Vankesteren’s (defendant) field, one of the department’s agents went to the field and observed a bird trap with pigeons inside. Without obtaining a warrant, the agent had a motion-activated camera installed on Vankesteren’s field. The camera had a 12-by-12-foot viewing radius and ran only during daylight hours. Within nine days, the video camera captured Vankesteren killing two birds that were caught in traps. The agent went to the surveillance area, found bird carcasses that had wounds matching those that Vankesteren appeared to inflict on camera, and identified the birds as red-tailed hawks, a protected species. Vankesteren admitted to accidentally catching some hawks and disposing of their carcasses. Vankesteren moved to suppress the video footage. The magistrate judge denied the motion to suppress and found Vankesteren guilty of two counts of taking or possessing a migratory bird without a permit. Vankesteren appealed, and the district court found no error. Vankesteren then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gregory, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership