Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Veysey

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
334 F.3d 600 (7th Cir. 2003)


Facts

John Veysey (defendant) intentionally burned down his house and collected the insurance proceeds. Veysey then rebuilt the house and blew it up, again collecting the insurance proceeds. Afterward, Veysey moved to a new house and burned it down to collect the insurance proceeds, and then set fire to another house before being arrested. Veysey was charged with fraud and arson. At trial, the prosecution introduced the expert testimony of Charles McClenahan. McClenahan testified that the probability of four residential houses burning down by chance during the period in which Veysey’s four houses were destroyed was 1 in 1.773 trillion. However, McClenahan’s methodology erroneously assumed that the probabilities of a person having four house fires were unrelated and independent of each other. An earlier house fire could have resulted from carelessness that made later house fires more likely, or alternatively could have promoted cautiousness that made later house fires less likely. McClenahan’s methodology also did not account for other factors that would have made the houses more or less likely to be destroyed by fire, such as age, location, style, and building materials. However, Veysey did not object to McClenahan’s methodology. Rather, Veysey only objected to McClenahan’s testimony generally, arguing that the testimony concluded Veysey was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and thus usurped the jury’s role. The trial court overruled the objection, and Veysey was convicted. Veysey appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.