United States v. Wachovia Bank

No. 1:10-cr-20165-JAL (2010)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Wachovia Bank

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
No. 1:10-cr-20165-JAL (2010)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

In June 2005, various federal agencies began investigating wire transfers from the United States sent to drug-trafficking organizations in Mexico to purchase airplanes for narcotics trafficking. The wire transfers were traced to bank accounts at the Miami office of Wachovia Bank (defendant). The bank accounts were held by Mexican currency-exchange houses, organizations that changed United States dollars to Mexican pesos. Wachovia offered three services to the currency-exchange houses: wire transfers, to transfer funds from the United States to Mexico; bulk cash exchange, in which Wachovia would collect dollars in Mexico and transport the cash to the United States; and remote capture deposit to electronically deposit checks. The federal agencies found several red flags that indicated that Wachovia should have been aware of the money-laundering scheme used by the drug-trafficking organizations, including the fact that individuals making wire transfers through Wachovia used fake identities, and that sequentially numbered checks were deposited into Wachovia accounts. In total, over $110 million in drug funds were laundered through Wachovia. The United States government (plaintiff) charged Wachovia with failing to maintain an effective anti-money-laundering program in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970. The government proposed a deferred-prosecution agreement, through which the charges against Wachovia would be dropped if Wachovia complied with the terms of the agreement. The proposed deferred-prosecution agreement required Wachovia to audit its transactions with the currency-exchange houses, implement new compliance programs to prevent money laundering, pay a forfeiture claim of $110 million, and pay a fine of $50 million.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership