From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
United States v. Wachovia Bank
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
No. 1:10-cr-20165-JAL (2010)
In June 2005, various federal agencies began investigating wire transfers from the United States sent to drug-trafficking organizations in Mexico to purchase airplanes for narcotics trafficking. The wire transfers were traced to bank accounts at the Miami office of Wachovia Bank (defendant). The bank accounts were held by Mexican currency-exchange houses, organizations that changed United States dollars to Mexican pesos. Wachovia offered three services to the currency-exchange houses: wire transfers, to transfer funds from the United States to Mexico; bulk cash exchange, in which Wachovia would collect dollars in Mexico and transport the cash to the United States; and remote capture deposit to electronically deposit checks. The federal agencies found several red flags that indicated that Wachovia should have been aware of the money-laundering scheme used by the drug-trafficking organizations, including the fact that individuals making wire transfers through Wachovia used fake identities, and that sequentially numbered checks were deposited into Wachovia accounts. In total, over $110 million in drug funds were laundered through Wachovia. The United States government (plaintiff) charged Wachovia with failing to maintain an effective anti-money-laundering program in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970. The government proposed a deferred-prosecution agreement, through which the charges against Wachovia would be dropped if Wachovia complied with the terms of the agreement. The proposed deferred-prosecution agreement required Wachovia to audit its transactions with the currency-exchange houses, implement new compliance programs to prevent money laundering, pay a forfeiture claim of $110 million, and pay a fine of $50 million.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.