United States v. Wang

222 F.3d 234 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Wang

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
222 F.3d 234 (2000)

Facts

Paul and Patricia Tsai owned a restaurant in Tennessee. The Tsais returned home after closing the restaurant one night with $1,200 in cash from the cash register. Min Wang (defendant), who had previously worked in the restaurant as a cook, and an accomplice were lying in wait for the Tsais. Wang and his accomplice struck and bound the Tsais, threatened them with a gun, stole a total of $4,200 in cash from the house including the cash from the restaurant, and then fled in the Tsais’ car. Wang was eventually arrested in Georgia and charged in federal court under federal criminal statutes including the Hobbs Act for robbery affecting interstate commerce, using a firearm during a crime of violence, carjacking, and transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce. The district court judge acquitted Wang on the carjacking charge but found him guilty on the other three counts. Wang appealed his convictions for robbery affecting interstate commerce and using a firearm during a crime of violence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Batchelder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership