United States v. Ward
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
989 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1993)
Wallace Ward (defendant) was charged with attempting to evade income tax and failing to file income taxes. Ward represented himself in the court proceedings. Prior to trial, Ward filed a motion proposing to change the oath that would be sworn by witnesses at his trial. In particular, Ward requested that the phrase “fully integrated Honesty” replace the word “truth.” A magistrate denied Ward’s motion. The district court affirmed the denial. At trial, Ward again sought to use his preferred oath. Ward offered to take both the traditional oath and his alternate oath. The district court did not allow Ward to do so. Ward did not take the stand as a witness or call any other witnesses, and he was convicted of all charges. Ward appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.