United States v. Ward
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
686 F.3d 879 (2012)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Terry Ward (plaintiff) secretly filmed W.D., a 12-year-old girl, while she entered and exited the shower in W.D.’s recreational vehicle (RV). W.D. was completely naked while she transitioned to and from the shower. To get the images Ward wanted, Ward positioned a hidden camera to face the hallway directly outside the shower area. Then, Ward directed W.D. to undress in the hallway and used vocal commands and physical touch to position W.D.’s body to continuously face the hidden camera, allowing Ward to capture full-length images of W.D.’s naked body, including her pubic area. W.D. was unaware she was being photographed. During the execution of a search warrant on Ward’s RV, state police discovered Ward’s photographs of W.D. along with thousands of images of child pornography. W.D. was subsequently convicted in Arkansas for raping a child. After the Arkansas conviction, the federal government (defendant) charged Ward with multiple counts of child exploitation and possession of child pornography. Ward was convicted on all counts after a jury trial. Ward appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of child sexual exploitation because the photographs of W.D. constituted mere nakedness, not lascivious exhibition.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Loken, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.