United States v. Warren

13 M.J. 160 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Warren

United States Court of Military Appeals
13 M.J. 160 (1982)

Facts

Robert L. Warren, Jr. (defendant) was convicted by special court-martial of several charges including willfully disobeying the order of a superior commissioned officer in violation of Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The charges arose from his refusal to get out of bed and into the field. Sergeant Schnell, Warren’s acting platoon sergeant, told Warren to get up and when Warren did not respond, Schnell shook Warren’s foot and attempted to pull him out of his tent. Warren became irate and threatened Schnell. Lieutenant Ferriole, the platoon commander, took Warren aside and spoke to him, telling him that he wanted him to calm down, relax, and take it easy for a minute. Warren did not calm down. Instead, he threatened Ferriole and others. Warren’s conviction was for disobeying Ferriole’s lawful order to “settle down and be quiet.” The United States Navy Court of Military Review affirmed the conviction. Warren appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction because Ferriole’s statement urging him to calm down had not been an order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership