United States v. Wells
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
101 F.3d 370 (1996)
- Written by Kelli Lanski, JD
Facts
Wendy Lois Wells (defendant) worked as a substitute teacher. While working at a school, she searched the desks of teachers for whom she was substituting and found and stole their personal information and social-security numbers. Wells committed identity theft by obtaining credit cards in the teachers’ names and making fraudulent purchases using the cards. Wells was convicted of mail fraud and the unauthorized use of a social-security number. Two of the teachers affected by Wells’s scheme submitted letters to the court detailing months of effort, hundreds of letters and phone calls to banks, law enforcement, and merchants, missed work, and other impacts to them from Wells’s stealing their identities. These included long-term effects on their ability to obtain credit and use their existing credit cards, which meant they had to carry cash in case merchants rejected their credit cards. They also carried affidavits explaining the situation to avoid arrest if merchants called police due to suspected forgery. The court filed these letters in the record, and the United States asked for an upward departure to Wells’s sentence based on the content of the letters and to address the victims’ nonmonetary losses in addition to the financial losses to the merchants Wells defrauded. The court granted the request, sentencing Wells to 30 months in prison, which was three months beyond the statutory maximum of 27 months. Wells appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dennis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.