United States v. Wells

101 F.3d 370 (1996)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Wells

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
101 F.3d 370 (1996)

KL

Facts

Wendy Lois Wells (defendant) worked as a substitute teacher. While working at a school, she searched the desks of teachers for whom she was substituting and found and stole their personal information and social-security numbers. Wells committed identity theft by obtaining credit cards in the teachers’ names and making fraudulent purchases using the cards. Wells was convicted of mail fraud and the unauthorized use of a social-security number. Two of the teachers affected by Wells’s scheme submitted letters to the court detailing months of effort, hundreds of letters and phone calls to banks, law enforcement, and merchants, missed work, and other impacts to them from Wells’s stealing their identities. These included long-term effects on their ability to obtain credit and use their existing credit cards, which meant they had to carry cash in case merchants rejected their credit cards. They also carried affidavits explaining the situation to avoid arrest if merchants called police due to suspected forgery. The court filed these letters in the record, and the United States asked for an upward departure to Wells’s sentence based on the content of the letters and to address the victims’ nonmonetary losses in addition to the financial losses to the merchants Wells defrauded. The court granted the request, sentencing Wells to 30 months in prison, which was three months beyond the statutory maximum of 27 months. Wells appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dennis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership