United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
638 F.2d 570 (1980)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
In 1978 the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (plaintiff) received a request to investigate the conditions of a plant operated by the Westinghouse Electric Corporation (the corporation) (defendant). The request informed NIOSH that several of the corporation’s employees were suffering allergic reactions from working at the plant. NIOSH conducted an inspection and believed that the chemical hexahydrophthalic anhydride (HHPA) was causing the allergic reactions. NIOSH then requested that the corporation provide the medical records of the employees who worked in the area of the plant believed to have high levels of HHPA. The corporation refused to provide the medical records on the ground of confidentiality. After multiple correspondences, the corporation provided NIOSH with a list of the employees but refused to provide any additional information. In response, NIOSH issued a subpoena. The corporation refused to comply with the subpoena, but informed NIOSH that it would produce the requested medical records upon each employee’s written informed consent and NIOSH’s assurance that the government would not disclose any information obtained to third parties. NIOSH then filed an action in federal district court for a court order requiring the corporation’s compliance with the subpoena. The district court returned a verdict in favor of NIOSH. The matter was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sloviter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.