United States v. White
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
569 F.2d 263 (1978)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
A federal jury convicted Phillip White (defendant) of possession of heroin with the intent to distribute it and a conspiracy charge. Two undercover Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents directed an informant, Oatis Leeper, to purchase heroin from White. The agents gave Leeper marked currency for the sale, but nothing in the trial record showed that White possessed the marked currency after the sale. White appealed, arguing in relevant part that the government (plaintiff) had failed to prove that an uninterrupted chain of custody existed for the heroin that was admitted at trial. White claimed that because the agents did not personally observe the sale, Leeper may have obtained the heroin from a different source.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thornberry, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.