United States v. White

698 F.3d 1005 (2012)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. White

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
698 F.3d 1005 (2012)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted William White (defendant), the editor of the white-supremacist "Overthrow" website, for soliciting a violent federal crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 373. Between 2005 and 2008, White posted a number of Overthrow messages in which he praised and advocated violence against blacks, Jews, gays, and the judge and jurors who convicted white supremacist Matthew Hale for violating § 373. One of White's postings applauded the murder of the Hale trial judge's family members. In September 2008, White posted the name, address, and phone numbers of "Juror A," whom he identified as the Hale jury's gay, Jewish foreman. The federal district court judge ruled that White's September 2008 posting was constitutionally protected free speech and dismissed the indictment. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded White's case for trial. The trial evidence established that the September 2008 posting motivated Overthrow users to send Juror A harassing, but not threatening, emails. There was conflicting testimony as to the accessibility of White's other Overthrow postings. Two white supremacists testified that White never instructed them to commit criminal acts, and expressed concern that his postings might incite violence, although one of them said he knew Overthrow users who looked to the site for such instructions. The jury convicted White, but the judge granted White's motion for a judgment of acquittal. The judge ruled that the government failed to meet § 373's requirement for circumstantial evidence that is "strongly corroborative" of the defendant's intent to solicit violence. The government appealed to the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership