United States v. White Fuel Corporation

498 F.2d 619 (1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. White Fuel Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
498 F.2d 619 (1974)

Facts

White Fuel Corporation (defendant) operated an oil-tank farm adjacent to a cove of the Boston Harbor. In May 1972, the Coast Guard found oil in the cove’s water. White Fuel admitted ownership of the oil. White Fuel discovered the oil had seeped into the cove from a large quantity of oil that had accumulated under White Fuel’s property. By September 1972, White Fuel had stopped the leak. White Fuel was charged with violating § 13 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. § 407 (the Refuse Act). After a nonjury trial, the district court convicted White Fuel of violating the Refuse Act. The district court denied White Fuel’s motion for judgment of acquittal and request to present evidence showing White Fuel did not know of the oil spill and acted diligently in remedying the issue. White Fuel appealed, arguing that the government failed to prove scienter or negligence on the part of White Fuel and that White Fuel should have been permitted to introduce evidence that it did not know about the underground oil and acted swiftly to fix the spill once informed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership