United States v. Williams

705 F.2d 603 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
705 F.2d 603 (1983)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Harrison Williams (defendant) was a United States senator from New Jersey. Alexander Feinberg (defendant) was an attorney and close friend of Williams. Williams and Feinberg owned interests in a titanium-mining venture. Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted a sting operation in which undercover Arab sheiks offered to make a $100 million loan to the mining venture and another group offered to purchase the mining venture for a hefty profit to all owners. Williams received what were worthless shares of stock in three corporations purportedly organized for the mining venture, in exchange for his promise to use his position as a United States senator to help obtain government contracts for the purchase of titanium. Williams and Feinberg were convicted of bribery and related charges. On appeal, Williams and Feinberg argued that because the stock Williams received had no commercial value, the district court erred in instructing the jury that the stock could be seen as a thing of value.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership