United States v. Williams
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
705 F.2d 603 (1983)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Harrison Williams (defendant) was a United States senator from New Jersey. Alexander Feinberg (defendant) was an attorney and close friend of Williams. Williams and Feinberg owned interests in a titanium-mining venture. Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted a sting operation in which undercover Arab sheiks offered to make a $100 million loan to the mining venture and another group offered to purchase the mining venture for a hefty profit to all owners. Williams received what were worthless shares of stock in three corporations purportedly organized for the mining venture, in exchange for his promise to use his position as a United States senator to help obtain government contracts for the purchase of titanium. Williams and Feinberg were convicted of bribery and related charges. On appeal, Williams and Feinberg argued that because the stock Williams received had no commercial value, the district court erred in instructing the jury that the stock could be seen as a thing of value.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.