United States v. Wilson
United States Supreme Court
421 U.S. 309 (1975)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Thomas Wilson (defendant), Bobby Bryan, and Robert Anderson were charged with separate bank robberies. During Anderson’s trial, Wilson was called as a witness. Wilson refused to testify because his answers might incriminate him. The judge granted Wilson immunity and ordered him to testify. Wilson still refused to do so, and the court summarily found Wilson in criminal contempt. Wilson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which found that a judge could not dispose of criminal contempt summarily in this case but instead had to provide notice and hearing and a reasonable time for defense preparation. In its view, only a disorderly or obstreperous interference with court proceedings provided an occasion for summary-contempt power. The government appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which granted cert.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.