Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Winslow

United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 202 (1913)


Facts

In 1899, the vast majority of shoes in the United States were manufactured with the assistance of three groups of machines: lasting machines, welt-sewing machines, and outsole-stitching machines. In February 1899, three shoe-machine companies (defendants) decided to merge, forming the United Shoe Machinery Company (USMC). Prior to the merger, the three shoe-machine companies had manufactured between 60 and 80 percent of all the lasting machines, welt-sewing machines, and outsole-stitching machines in the United States. Each company only made one type of machine, and none of the companies were in direct competition with each other. After the merger, USMC operated out of a single factory and continued to produce the types of machines that had been previously manufactured independently. The United States (plaintiff) brought an action against the shoe-machine companies, alleging in part that the merger violated the Sherman Act as an unreasonable trade restraint. The district court held that the charges were not actionable. The United States Supreme Court issued a writ of error to determine whether the shoe-machine companies had actually been charged with actionable offenses under the Sherman Act.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.